GPU Comparison Tool
Side-by-side comparison of 15 GPUs for AI workloads. Filter by workload, price, or brand, then sort any column to find the right card for your budget. Each row links to our in-depth guide.
If you just want the answer
Handles 34B LLMs, SDXL, Flux. The default choice for most AI users.
Best budget RTX 4060 Ti 16GB 16GB · ~$400Cheapest new card with enough VRAM for 7B-13B LLMs and SDXL.
Best used value RTX 3090 24GB · ~$800 usedSame VRAM as 4090 at half the price. Inspect condition carefully.
Maximum capability RTX 5090 32GB · ~$2,000Only single card that handles 70B LLMs at practical quantization.
Best for image gen RTX 4070 Ti Super 16GB · ~$700Sweet spot for SDXL and Flux. 16GB covers every current workflow.
Or filter the full table
15 of 15 GPUs match your filters
| GPU | VRAM | Bandwidth | Price (new) | Price (used) | 13B LLM | SDXL | TDP | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA A6000 NVIDIA | 48GB GDDR6 | 768 GB/s | $3,500 | $2,500 | 35 tok/s | 5.5s | 300W | Single-card 70B LLM inference; ECC memory |
| RTX 5090 NVIDIA | 32GB GDDR7 | 1792 GB/s | $2,000 | — | 55 tok/s | 2.5s | 575W | 34B+ LLMs, flagship AI work, future-proofing |
| RTX 4090 NVIDIA | 24GB GDDR6X | 1008 GB/s | $1,600 | $1,200 | 40 tok/s | 3.2s | 450W | Best overall for most AI users; 24GB covers 34B LLMs |
| RTX 5080 NVIDIA | 16GB GDDR7 | 960 GB/s | $1,000 | — | 32 tok/s | 3.8s | 360W | 16GB + GDDR7 speed for 7B-13B; cheaper than 4090 |
| RX 7900 XTX AMD | 24GB GDDR6 | 960 GB/s | $900 | $700 | 25 tok/s | 6s | 355W | 24GB AMD — Linux-first ROCm users only |
| RTX 3090 (used) NVIDIA | 24GB GDDR6X | 936 GB/s | — | $800 | 35 tok/s | 4.5s | 350W | Best VRAM/$ for AI — 24GB at half the 4090 price |
| RTX 5070 Ti NVIDIA | 16GB GDDR7 | 896 GB/s | $750 | — | 28 tok/s | 4.3s | 300W | Best sub-$1000 Blackwell for AI; 16GB sweet spot |
| RTX 4070 Ti Super NVIDIA | 16GB GDDR6X | 672 GB/s | $700 | $600 | 24 tok/s | 5s | 285W | Best sweet-spot GPU for AI under $1000 |
| RTX 5070 NVIDIA | 12GB GDDR7 | 672 GB/s | $550 | — | 20 tok/s | 5.5s | 250W | Fast 7B models; 12GB limits 13B headroom |
| RTX 5060 Ti 16GB NVIDIA | 16GB GDDR7 | 448 GB/s | $450 | — | 22 tok/s | 6.5s | 180W | Best new GPU under $500; 16GB at Blackwell prices |
| RX 7800 XT AMD | 16GB GDDR6 | 624 GB/s | $450 | $380 | 18 tok/s | 8.5s | 263W | 16GB AMD — ROCm-comfortable users with Linux |
| RTX 4060 Ti 16GB NVIDIA | 16GB GDDR6 | 288 GB/s | $400 | $350 | 18 tok/s | 7.5s | 165W | Best VRAM/$ new card; 16GB for 7B-13B LLMs |
| RTX 4060 NVIDIA | 8GB GDDR6 | 272 GB/s | $280 | $230 | won't fit | 10s | 115W | Entry-level; 8GB limits model sizes |
| RTX 3060 12GB (used) NVIDIA | 12GB GDDR6 | 360 GB/s | — | $250 | 12 tok/s | 9.5s | 170W | Cheapest way into real AI — 12GB at $250 |
| Intel Arc B580 INTEL | 12GB GDDR6 | 456 GB/s | $250 | — | 10 tok/s | 11s | 190W | Experimental; 12GB at $250 but software gaps |
How to read this table
- VRAM is the single most important spec for AI. It determines which models you can run at all. 16GB is the practical minimum for 2026 AI work.
- Memory bandwidth (GB/s) drives LLM token generation speed — higher is faster at the same VRAM tier. GDDR7 > GDDR6X > GDDR6 at comparable cards.
- 13B LLM (tok/s) estimates throughput running a 13B model at Q4_K_M quantization with short context (2-4K). Actual numbers vary with driver, context length, and framework.
- SDXL (seconds) is time to generate one 1024×1024 image with a 25-step DPM++ 2M Karras sampler — standard A1111/ComfyUI benchmark config.
- "Won't fit" means the target model at Q4 exceeds available VRAM with realistic KV cache / batch overhead — running it would OOM or fall back to painful CPU offload.
- Price (used) reflects typical eBay / r/hardwareswap pricing at time of publish. Shift ±15% depending on seller condition and mining wear.
How to choose — the short version
VRAM first, then bandwidth, then price. Most AI headaches come from picking a GPU that can't load your target model. Match the model size you want to run (7B / 13B / 34B LLM, SDXL, Flux) to the minimum VRAM tier, then use bandwidth and price to decide within that tier. Used RTX 3090s routinely beat newer mid-range cards on VRAM-heavy workloads.
Performance numbers are representative ranges synthesized from manufacturer specifications, Tom's Hardware and TechPowerUp benchmarks, Puget Systems lab reports, and community benchmarks (LocalScore, r/StableDiffusion, r/LocalLLaMA). This is not first-party testing. See our methodology for how we evaluate GPUs and editorial policy for how we make recommendations.